Trending...
- PebblePad Welcomes Justin Reilly as New CEO to Drive Innovation and Growth
- New Website Uses A.I. To Help Readers Think All Of Your Books Into Existence
- Retirement Income Specialist Daniel Rondberg Joins Tom Hegna on the Exciting New Season of "Financial Freedom with Tom Hegna"
Will Nevada's Highest Court Confront Corruption—Or Allow It to Continue?
LAS VEGAS - Missouriar -- Source: The Verity Project
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Missouriar
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Missouriar
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Karina Singer, a pro se appellant and daughter of the late Steven J. Singer, is awaiting a critical ruling from the Nevada Supreme Court after filing extensive, unrebutted evidence of fiduciary misconduct, elder financial abuse, and judicial irregularities in her father's trust and estate case.
The appeal—Case No. 89171—was originally retained by the Supreme Court for over eight months before being suddenly transferred to the Nevada Court of Appeals just days after Singer formally requested summary disposition, citing NRAP 31(d), and presenting direct evidence of court record tampering, elder exploitation, and constitutional due process violations.
Despite following every procedural rule available to self-represented litigants—including the Court's own Informal Brief Form, which lacks a section for a routing statement—the transfer was carried out without addressing any of the pending dispositive motions or the substantial evidence submitted into the record, some of which includes:
- Forged financial account documents and unopposed motions for trustee removal, accounting, criminal fraud, and elder abuse.
- Allegations of perjury and false police reports by opposing parties,
- Tampering with electronic court service systems and docket manipulation,
- Improper distribution of over $1 million in trust assets in direct violation of the trust's provisions.
Singer has since filed an Emergency Motion to Recall Transfer and Retain Jurisdiction, along with a Supplement and Renewed Request for Summary Disposition or Evidentiary Hearing, refuting every baseless argument in the Respondents' opposition. All motions are currently before a panel of three Supreme Court Justices, Patricia Lee, Linda Bell, and Douglas Herndon.
More on Missouriar
- Daniel Schmitt & Co. Sells Rare Ferrari Owned by Sylvester Stallone
- Damian Redd's "Caught in a Fantasy" Surpasses 100,000 Views on VEVO/YouTube Following Album Reissue
- The816 Partners with Premiere Insurance to Launch Groundbreaking Community Activation in Kansas City
- Springfield: Arrest made in 1989 cold case
- Columbia Fire Department responds to outdoor gas leak, April 17
"The law is not in question. The facts are not in dispute," said Singer. "If the Nevada Supreme Court fails to apply the law and address the uncontested evidence already in the record, it exposes both the Court and the State of Nevada to federal intervention, civil rights litigation, and a potential RICO action for coordinated misconduct involving trustees, attorneys, and judicial officers. This is no longer just about my father; it's about a systemic breakdown that cannot be ignored."
The Court has everything it needs to act. The real question is: Will the Nevada Supreme Court stand for truth and justice under controlling law and binding precedent; or sacrifice its legitimacy, trigger federal scrutiny, and lose the trust of the people it was created to protect?
Singer's filings argue that the transfer violated the Nevada Rules of Appellate Procedure and, if not reversed, would leave constitutional violations unaddressed and incentivize further abuse within Nevada's probate and guardianship courts. She asserts that the Supreme Court has a mandatory, non-waivable obligation under NRAP 17(a)(9)–(11) to retain jurisdiction over appeals involving judicial misconduct, systemic due process failures, issues of first impression, and matters of statewide public concern. Singer requests that the Court recall the transfer, retain jurisdiction, and summarily rule in her favor under NRAP 31(d), citing the complete absence of an answering brief and any disputed facts in the record. She further urges the Court to grant en banc review, hold responsible parties accountable, and issue a published decision that restores public trust by acknowledging and correcting the serious legal errors committed in the lower court.
More on Missouriar
- Springfield: Jefferson Avenue Footbridge to come down next month as part of rehabilitation project
- Supedia Launches as the Ultimate Resource Hub for Entrepreneurs and Business Professionals
- City of Columbia to begin accepting proposals for FY 2026 CDBG and HOME program funding April 21
- "May the Fourth Be With You" Epic Star Wars Day Run/Walk in Alexandria, Va
- City of Columbia adds parking ticket service to PayCoMo platform
As Nevada watches, the decision in The Matter of Steven J. Singer Trust & Estate - Singer v. Boekankamp could set a precedent for how the state's highest court handles self-represented litigants, judicial accountability, and the integrity of trust and estate proceedings.
Source: The Verity Project
0 Comments
Latest on Missouriar
- ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. TO WEBCAST A DISCUSSION OF SECOND QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 2025 RESULTS ON MAY 6
- Local Leap Marketing Wins Creative Excellence Award for Healthcare Web Design
- Home Run Pest & Termite Control Delivers No-Contract Pest Solutions to Wylie, Rockwall & Surrounding Areas
- Lauren Coyle Rosen Unveils Debut Album 'Purify Flame'
- Alex Shaw awarded Senior Certification for Genesis FirstPath ABA/TMS Software
- Best Autism Care- St Charles County, Missouri
- American Mensa Welcomes 7-Year-Old Savannah Boy
- Springfield: Prosecutor determines February officer-involved shooting justified
- Portland Hosts Mensa's 2025 Mind Games®
- T&S and US Conec Ink Global Licensing Deal on MDC Technology to Advance High-Density Optical Interconnects
- Goosechase Rolls Out Unlockable Missions, Its Most Anticipated Feature Yet
- Couples Too Broke to Break Up – Divorce Expert Warns of Hidden Separation Crisis Amid Cost of Living Squeeze
- Springfield Police investigate murder, suicide at John B. Hughes Apartments
- Coming Up on "Financial Freedom with Tom Hegna" Retirement Authority Daniel Rondberg from Nation's First Financial
- The Ten News Wins 2025 Ambie Award for Best News Podcast
- Columbia: Incoming council members to be sworn in at special City Council meeting, April 17
- ServiceAgent.ai Brings 24/7 AI Call Answering to America's Home Services
- Springfield: Public's assistance needed in identifying suspect vehicle
- Jed the Fish, The Rapscallion of Los Angeles KROQ's Airwaves and Provocateur, Has Signed Off at 69
- Mayor Cara Spencer Takes Office as the 48th Mayor of St. Louis